source url To drift in its radically decelerated non-action is to experience our lives under capitalism: Paralyzed and defenceless, yet sort of enjoying the ride. The bongs, sleeping bags, and Pepsi cans. They looked like refuges that a group of people built for themselves because the outside world did not grant them one. The clothes they wore, gym shorts, and an Antifa t-shirt, made them look like ….
lazirumamyde.cf: Gone 5: Angst (German Edition) eBook: Michael Grant, Jacqueline Csuss: Kindle Store. Kes ohne Angst (German Edition) [A. G. Stoll] on lazirumamyde.cf *FREE* shipping on titles $ to buy; Paperback $ 2 Used from $ 5 New from $
It has something radical because everybody in there has the agency to let everything collapse in a moment, you know? That creates the possibility for something poetic. People were offended by the blank gazes of the performers. This sense of nothing actually happening is a very real feeling that is easily transferrable to just being in the world. I was interested in the different disciplines that opera brings together. Music, a narrative, text, and movement. There are operatic gestures in the piece.
The most dominant ones are these variations on the middle finger. This all began with Eliza standing on the top stairwell in Basel, turning in circles while holding her arm out and giving the middle finger, joking that this would be the first thing the viewer would see before even entering the exhibition space. It reminded me of a scene I saw in a London underground. A drunk couple was fighting, and then she got onto the train.
The doors shut, and he was screaming, walking after it. He tried to raise his middle fingers towards this train — the train that was already gone with his anger, which was still there. This ambiguous, half-raised middle finger became one of the signature movements of Angst. Billy Bultheel composed the music. All of the pieces — the march, the ballet, an overture — are deconstructed into separate tracks. The different instrumental elements were divided onto iPhones, the idea being that people come together or signal from a distance to sync their phones. The dancers hold the speakers of their phones up to the small mics that are attached to their bodies.
The tracks can never be perfectly synced. And you can feel it. Falling was a big motif. For the character of the Diver, we worked on crowdsurfing. The figure has a longing for dissolution into something bigger than himself, a longing for death in a way. So we made an elegant version of that weird, loaded gesture full of pathos. Of course, if the Lover is one person, it can be a kind of difficult situation. She meets herself halfway through the piece. These roles were not assigned to the actors to be performed all throughout the piece. Instead, they were shared bet-ween them and traded over time.
The group seemed unfazed by this and rather comfortable allowing their identity positions to expand and contract with natural flui-dity. They know consistency is an unsustainable notion. Its outdated parameters no longer apply within Angst. Maybe a phone is just a phone, but what does it become in our hands? Instead of worrying that technological devices flatten our emotional landscape until they match the surface of their sleek screens, Angst proposes that they become extensions of our bodies, ourselves.
A certain amount of suspicion is commendable in regard to technological advances that work for us just like they work to surveil us. But remaining open to the possibilities they offer is crucial to the advancement of us as a people. People tend to be offended whenever technology appears in contemporary art. But you used technology in two more -nuanced ways: the tenderness of communication and the threatening presence of drones.
I wanted the drones to fly in a swarm. They were programmed so that they lost control over time. Battery lives became important. The phones are just these things everybody now has to connect with other people. That scares people too, because these devices can bring people together in a group in an instant. Everybody has this kind of agency to react very quickly in a moment.
Including me. Comment Little by little your discussion scaring me ;-. It's slang though, of course. I'm certain all are acceptable in various types of English. Comment RKS no there isn't one word you can put in that phrase to make it not slang, it's slang no matter what. Comment How about "the living daylights"?
Still slang? Comment Yep - wouldn't be considered highly idiomatic English anyway ;-. Comment To be fair to Kat on the subject of google, English differs from other languages in that their is no centralised language authority - so "correct" English is defined solely by its usage. If you find 20 million hits using one phrase, and only 3 using an alternative suggestion, chances are that the alternative is not common parlance. That's not to say you shouldn't be wary when using google - for a start, there are loads of typos out there and not everyone uses a "professional" standard of English.
There are loads of machine translations. There are words in other languages with the same spelling as english words. There are common mistakes alot, putting the apostrophe all over the place etc. And above all, there's the chance that the phrase you are googling seems so much more popular because it in fact is used in a totally different situation.
Just to underline this fact, if you typed "sex" in to google, you'd come up with loads of results, none of which use "sex" in the sense of biological sex. That doesn't mean that we don't use the word "sex" in this way, just that some of the results in google are heavily skewed due to people trying to get on the first page of hits. So I found google comparisons useful, but to be taken with a pinch of salt. The same obviously goes for these forums too. You can't just take any suggestion from LEO and use it willy-nilly if you don't know the word and how it's used.
Dispatch German Angst vs. Comment I am agreed that "but google says so" arguments are the pits. There is also a second set of title cards, printed in a plainer font, without multiple exclamation points, to indicate scenes that are still missing. As music director of the Vienna State Opera, he was widely recognized as the most important musician in the most important musical city. Irene is bored with her comfortable life and has succumbed to her sexual desires, but mostly what she was looking for was an adventure; however, this comes at a high price. You are already subscribed to this email. The early scene of workers trudging into the dark maw of their underground factory has been copied to death most recently in ''Road to Perdition'' , but it remains unsurpassed as an image of how mechanized work for another's profit can strip people of their individuality.
Check that you are using it in the right context using google :p. Comment X - by all means google can be used as a comparison tool and I'd never say it can't. What I'm against is it being used to attempt to win an argument or to prove something as irrefutably correct!
Comment Re Hmm, I thought it was a perfectly valid American idiom. And I'd call it colloquial, not necessarily slang. But as we all know, there's a fine line between the two. The google hits comparison can often be useful - as shown by the two examples.
In some cases cookies from third parties are also used. Lost password. Don't use online translation tools, and above all don't use them to judge whether a translation is any good. Maybe for you as an American Kat, not for me as a Brit.
Personally, as a Brit, I find "you're scaring me" sounds much more like natural flowing English. You get a whopping hits for "make me scared" site:uk as opposed to 30, for "scare me" site:uk. Jamiet - there are also trolls everywhere :- And whoever tries to prove something is or isn't ok with google must be retarded!
I'm from England and I see nothing wrong with 'you're making me scared' in context e. J UK - as compared to million for "we are" I am agreed that "but google says so" arguments are the pits.
Kat - you're welcome to think what you like and put forward your opinions too but you cannot say something is categorically wrong if there are plenty of other native speakers disagreeing with you, no matter what google may or may not say irrelevant. I never said wrong, I said unidiomatic - and I stick to that. It's all about implication :- I don't actually care about any of this anyway to be honest, since American English is so different from English that I can't even understand it at times.
RKS no there isn't one word you can put in that phrase to make it not slang, it's slang no matter what. Yep - wouldn't be considered highly idiomatic English anyway ;-. To be fair to Kat on the subject of google, English differs from other languages in that their is no centralised language authority - so "correct" English is defined solely by its usage.